Student Evaluations of ProControl’s Onsite Four-Day Course:

 

Revelations on Dynamic Process Analysis and Advanced Control

for Process Engineers

 

Comments below are from Process Engineers at the U.S. refineries and chemicals plants of one of the world’s largest petrochemical corporations

 

Specific student quotes on the course and its structure:

 

"I have a fair amount of experience (15 years) as a Process Engineer, but very little in controls.  As our plants push for statistical process control and consistent product quality, the knowledge gained in this class will be very valuable."

 

"This course has been one of the most practical classes I have taken;  I could have used it earlier."   (This Process Engineer had previously taken both a Beginning and an Advanced Statistical Process Control course.)

 

"This class was very beneficial.  My understanding of controls and the need to know my process were strengthened.  I think now I will be able to better apply myself and help the Control Engineers."

 

"I have a much better understanding of the basics of dynamic control now.  The conceptual presentation of the subject is very good and well worth the time and money."

 

"I liked how we were led into making some of our own conclusions; e.g.:  why did we start out modeling the process from plant test data, instead of tuning?  So we can then tune from the model!"

 

"This class is a must for all Process Engineers and their supervisors.  It would also be good for people supervising Instrument Technicians."

 

"The lectures are very relevant and informative;  the lab exercises support the lectures very well - they include the types of comparison and sensitivity studies that we should do at the plant."

 

"I think that the analysis of process variability and the learning of the type of control to counteract it is a main part of this course.  This warrants the time!"

 

"I have gained a good amount of insight this week that, in combination with the Control Engineers, can be very effective.  I can use this course directly for several applications at the RHU."

 

"I felt that I learned a lot and that this course will prove beneficial in my process analysis.  I know that it is a control course, but I think that I learned so much more!"

 

"This has been a very impressive class.  I would recommend that every Process Engineer take this so they understand how control works and they have the "language" skills to work effectively with the Control Engineers.  This class fills the need."

 

"I believe that now I will be better able to converse with the Control Engineers in the design phase of my processes."

 

"This class broadened my overall knowledge of how to optimize a process through control applications, and how to troubleshoot a process through data correlation."

 

"I have three years of experience and I felt that the course was well worthwhile; it will help in teamwork with Process Control group engineers."

 

"After completing this course, I feel a lot more comfortable about tuning a control loop.   Before, when I tuned a loop it was mostly just a guess.  I knew of PID's, but didn't have a clear idea of how to use them."

 

"I learned the most about tuning a PID controller;  I had never really understood it before."

 

"Quizzes are put to good use - to see if the students are all on track."

 

"Excellent lectures - detailed and specific!"

 

"I learned how to tune loops in a methodical manner (not trial and error as before)."

 

"A very good course!  I think the approach is EXCELLENT!"

 

"The course was very worthwhile.  As plant processes and controls become more complicated, Process and Control Engineers should become more integrated."

 

"Well justified class - a real moneymaker!"

 

"PID tuning interested me the most - I can easily see a Process Engineering application for this."

 

"I think all Process Engineers would benefit from this course - it was very helpful to me.   I wish I had taken it before any other courses."

 

"To be able to tune controller loops now is a big plus - I can use this now back in the plant."

 

"I now have a basic understanding of how control applications are developed and maintained.  This knowledge will allow me to better apply my skills to any technical service I provide."

 

"A highly participative class - a very effective way to teach."

 

"The class is a good mix of practical experience and theory."

 

"It was definitely a worthwhile course.  Even though I consider myself fairly experienced, I have never really understood most of the topics presented before."

 

"This course will help me communicate with the Control Engineers."

 

"This course is definitely a strong plus for my career.  I strongly recommend it for all Process Engineers involved with implementing Process Control Projects."

 

"I found it very worthwhile; it would have been helpful earlier in my 3 year career."

 

"A very practical course - I will now be able to look at a response and say whether it should be tuned further."

 

"The process analysis section was my favorite because it feels great to finally have some tools for better accomplishing my day-to-day work."

 

"This course has made me want to ask a lot of questions back at the plant - like why aren't we using any derivative in our controllers?  Maybe we should reexamine our tuning parameters!"

 

"Now that I understand cascades and PID's I can communicate with the Control Engineer, and develop tuning that will maximize impurities in product streams without going off spec."

 

"This course was immensely valuable - I am going to recommend this course to every Process Engineer at our plant.  They need to get more involved in this area."

 

""I am very experienced, yet it was worthwhile.  All Tech Service Engineers need this information also!"

 

Even with several years of experience I found the course very worthwhile."

 

"I will be supervising engineers who routinely will be doing plant testing, PID tuning, and configuration of cascades so this information will be extremely helpful to me."

 

"I feel like I have a much better understanding of control and will become more involved in the control of my unit now that I am armed with a little knowledge!"

 

"For myself as a Process Engineer - it is better to know everything a bit so we can understand what the process computer control people want to do in the unit."

 

"I now know what type of controller to use where - it will be very helpful to me since I am often responsible for start-ups."

 

"The whole series of examples which led to discovering how the tuning constants relate to process dynamics was great.  It helps me as a Process Engineer relate to how important knowledge of those dynamics are."

 

"I was very interested in learning how to decipher the usefulness and validity of data without upsetting the whole plant.  It seems that there is about a 90% garbage to 10% useful data ratio in this world!"

 

"This course was definitely worthwhile.  Over the next couple of years our emphasis at the plant is on improving process control.  This has been the first class where I really understood what that entails."

 

"I have five years of design and troubleshooting experience and I needed this course now just as much as I needed it five years ago."

 

"Throughout the course I have found examples of where I can improve operations, through your examples in class."

 

"I am an experienced Process Engineer.  I wish I took this course twelve years ago.  Both I and this plant would have benefited a lot!"

 

 

Comments on ProControl vs. Other Companies offering process control education

 

"ProControl's biggest advantage is teaching the understanding of exactly what is happening -- with P, I, and D for example."    This engineer had previously taken SAIT's (Calgary, Canada) Advanced Control Course, Foxboro's, and *****'s Basic and Advanced Statistical Control courses.

 

"vs. Foxboro's Distillation Course:  ProControl's course will be of more direct use in the plant."

 

"vs. Foxboro Distillation:  this course was more useful and easier to follow and provided a lot of practical tools to be used back on the job."

 

"Since this course brought very little theory into the fray, classes like Distillation Dynamics and Control (AIChE) paled in comparison."

 

"This was the BEST EVER - over my college courses and our two day in-house class."

 

"This class far outweighs *****'s Basic Process Control Course because of its in-depth study and the coverage of real control problems."

 

"I've taken control courses in college and at our research center, but this course by far put it all in place.  I never really had a grasp on P, I, D - now I do."

 

"This is more valuable and more practical than *****'s Advanced Process Control Seminar."

 

"This was much more practical than any previous class (Honeywell and ModComp)."

 

"This course has been more beneficial than any of the others."

 

 

Comments on the instructor and his teaching methods:

 

"The instruction was evenly paced; he made certain that everyone understood what he was talking about for each subject."

 

"The use of plain language to explain difficult concepts certainly helped the learning process.  He repeated the concepts in different ways which helped a lot."

 

"Very effective style - he made one think."

 

"The instructor's experience and his stories are what make the class practical."

 

"The style is conceptual: he starts at the bottom of the individual's understanding and builds on that until he brings the individual up to the final goals."

 

"He made potentially dull topics interesting - very similar to a very good professor."

 

"Very effective use of flip charts/colors, etc.  The fact that I had to do coding and take notes will increase my retention."

 

"He really wants you to learn, and this comes across immediately."

 

"He related theoretical topics with real life - explained how this stuff works at the gut (nuts and bolts) level."

 

"The lectures are very understandable, even to one that hasn't English as a mother tongue."

 

"He was very open to listen to plant problems and was willing to solve them."

 

"A very methodical style.  He knew where he was going and where he wanted us to end up.  He answered all questions - if necessary he digressed to make sure everyone understood."

 

"Very open to class participation and questions - very effective.  He tried to tailor the teaching to the understanding of the class (which is good)."

 

"Technically he's a genius.  Good understanding of student engineers' difficulty with the topic materials."

 

"Very good teaching skills.  He explained things thoroughly and simply, but was not patronizing."

 

"He was able to teach the most un-understandable subjects in an easy and practical way."